We've also ask three other experts to take a look at Halamka's findings and add their own insights. We followed Halamka's progress, and now we have his conclusions. Halamka judged the three operating systems according to a variety of criteria including their performance, user interfaces and enterprise management capabilities, such as the ability to configure applications, easily organize file systems, and establish granular security control. After evaluating all three to determine which worked best for him, he plans to begin testing his preferred setup with users, most of whose desktops currently run Windows. Finally, he took up a Dell D420 subnotebook running Microsoft's Windows XP. Then he spent a month using a Lenovo ThinkPad X41 running a dual-boot configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation and Red Hat Fedora Core. He replaced it first with a MacBook running OS X. So when Halamka's laptop running Windows XP interrupted several presentations with inopportune antivirus and application updates, he decided his next big initiative would be to determine which desktop operating system-Windows XP, Apple's OS X or Linux-is the most secure, most reliable and easiest to use in a corporate environment.įor three months, Halamka ditched his Windows laptop. The PCs inside the hospital have to work too. But as a health-care administrator, he's not solely interested in testing the cutting-edge, Orwellian technologies that make headlines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |